Meta and other tech giants are pushing structural changes at the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT), a move that has triggered a mass resignation of expert advisers from the meta‑led anti‑terrorism group. The resignations came after the consortium announced a reorganization that critics say will shift decision‑making power toward corporate leadership and reduce independent oversight.

GIFCT is a consortium of major internet companies that was created to share data and best practices for identifying and removing extremist content online. Meta, as the leading member, has played a central role in setting the forum’s agenda and coordinating policy initiatives. The proposed changes include a new governance board composed mainly of senior executives from the founding firms, a streamlined review process, and a reduced role for external experts in monitoring compliance.

Outside researchers have expressed concern that these structural adjustments could weaken oversight of an already embattled consortium. They argue that the current model already faces scrutiny over transparency and effectiveness, and that limiting the influence of independent advisers may erode accountability. The mass resignation of experts—who had been instrumental in developing technical tools and policy guidelines—highlights the growing unease within the community about the forum’s direction.

The fallout underscores the importance of maintaining robust oversight mechanisms in any organization that tackles online extremism. If the proposed reforms proceed without broader input, the effectiveness of GIFCT’s initiatives could be compromised, potentially affecting the ability of governments and civil society to monitor and counter terrorist propaganda. The consortium will need to address these concerns promptly to preserve its credibility and ensure that its efforts remain aligned with global counter‑terrorism objectives.